Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 15 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Electoral Administration Bill.
Electoral Administration Bill
My Lords, I am most grateful to the noble Baroness for clarifying the Government’s position. She suggested two reasons why the text of the Bill is sound: first, that a loan transaction between a registered party and a bank located not in the United Kingdom but in some other part of a member state would not constitute a transaction which fell within the provisions of the Treaty of Rome. With that judgment, I respectfully disagree. However, I understand the second arm of her argument which is that such a transaction may fall within the public policy provisions of the treaty, provisions which are an exception to all the fundamental freedoms of the treaty. I now understand that that is the basis upon which the Government are approaching this matter. So clarified, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 108 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c111-2
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disability Absent voting Finance Elections Donors Documents Electoral register Grants Legislation Northern Ireland Political parties Mental capacity Loans Married people Ulster Unionist Party
- Legislation
- Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:00:45 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321716
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321716
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_321716