Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Anelay of St Johns (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 17 May 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.


Violent Crime Reduction Bill

That was very helpful and took us further forward. Of course, the Government do not like to have lists because, as the Minister says, they can go on for ever. Oppositions always like to use amendments such as this to tease out what the Government really mean. The undertaking that the Minister has given certainly satisfies me. His description of the importance of consultation being proactive is the most important part of his answer. I undertake to ensure that his response is made available to the north London Chinese community. I hope that it will give them as much assurance as it has given me. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 102 not moved.] Clause 16 agreed to. Clause 17 [Supplemental provisions for Chapter 2]:


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c305-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disability Children Abuse Crime Alcoholic drinks Crimes of violence Deportation Business Anti-social behaviour Gun sports Firearms Exemptions Foreign nationals Ethnic groups Licensed premises Drunkenness Prisoners Offensive weapons Minority groups Prisoners' release Sentencing Sales Security Sportsgrounds Alcohol disorder zones
Legislation
Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk