Proceeding contribution from Lord Evans of Temple Guiting (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 18 May 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security (Income Support and Jobseekers Allowance) Amendment Regulations 2006.
Social Security (Income Support and Jobseeker’s Allowance) Amendment Regulations 2006
My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Lords, Lord Skelmersdale and Lord Oakeshott, for their general welcome of the order. A number of important points have been raised, which I shall attempt to answer. I suspect that noble Lords may like a fuller explanation of the point about the eight-week period than I can give today. I have spoken to officials, and we shall provide that in the next few days. Our research on the eight-week limit has shown that the vast majority of court cases last eight weeks or less. I acknowledge that a minority can be much longer—fraud cases have been mentioned—and officials will keep that under review. If any jobseekers are shown to be disadvantaged by the eight-week limit, we shall consider extending the provision. This is a very important issue and we shall—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c498-9
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Courts Benefits rules Carers Attendance Employment Jobseeker's allowance Income support Juries Eligibility Exemptions Interviews Police custody Social security benefits
- Legislation
- Social Security (Income Support and Jobseekers Allowance) Amendment Regulations 2006
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:13:59 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323149
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323149
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323149