Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Evans of Temple Guiting (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 18 May 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security (Income Support and Jobseekers Allowance) Amendment Regulations 2006.


Social Security (Income Support and Jobseeker’s Allowance) Amendment Regulations 2006

My Lords, I am very grateful to the noble Lords, Lord Skelmersdale and Lord Oakeshott, for their general welcome of the order. A number of important points have been raised, which I shall attempt to answer. I suspect that noble Lords may like a fuller explanation of the point about the eight-week period than I can give today. I have spoken to officials, and we shall provide that in the next few days. Our research on the eight-week limit has shown that the vast majority of court cases last eight weeks or less. I acknowledge that a minority can be much longer—fraud cases have been mentioned—and officials will keep that under review. If any jobseekers are shown to be disadvantaged by the eight-week limit, we shall consider extending the provision. This is a very important issue and we shall—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c498-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Courts Benefits rules Carers Attendance Employment Jobseeker's allowance Income support Juries Eligibility Exemptions Interviews Police custody Social security benefits
Legislation
Social Security (Income Support and Jobseekers Allowance) Amendment Regulations 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk