Proceeding contribution from Lord Evans of Temple Guiting (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 18 May 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Social Security (Income Support and Jobseekers Allowance) Amendment Regulations 2006.
Social Security (Income Support and Jobseeker’s Allowance) Amendment Regulations 2006
My Lords, all that I can say to the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, is that I do not agree. I explained in my opening remarks what the order is attempting to do and it does precisely that. There are details around the edges, some of which are very important, that noble Lords have raised. On why we have introduced this order, I gave absolutely clear reasons why and the effects that introducing this order will have on the jobseeker’s scheme. I do not accept the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, that this order should be taken away and withdrawn. With apologies for that, I commend the order to the House. On Question, Motion agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c500
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Courts Benefits rules Carers Attendance Employment Jobseeker's allowance Income support Juries Eligibility Exemptions Interviews Police custody Social security benefits
- Legislation
- Social Security (Income Support and Jobseekers Allowance) Amendment Regulations 2006
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:13:57 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323159
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323159
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323159