Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Paul Robert Holmes (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Friday, 12 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill.


Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill

I can reassure the House that, given the very short time available for this debate, I am about to make the shortest speech that I have ever made in the five years for which I have had the honour to serve in the House. The right hon. Member for Swansea, West(Mr. Williams) and the Minister have given ample justification for the withdrawal of new clause 1 and the associated amendments. If the new clause were accepted, it would effectively negate the Bill. The vast majority of incidents that the emergency services attend are on, or involve, private property, so the Bill would be unworkable if so amended. The right hon. Gentleman deserves great credit for getting the Bill through to this stage. Members in all parts of the House expressed support for it in Committee and on Second Reading, and I hope that we can make very rapid progress in the few minutes left.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
446 c672 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Crimes of violence Health professions Emergency services Protection Staff Sentencing
Legislation
Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk