Proceeding contribution from Greg Knight (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Friday, 12 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill.
Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill
Surely any fireman worth his salt, on seeing a patch of heather on fire and noticing that a farmer was attending to it and had it under control, would turn the fire engine round and go back. That would be the common-sense approach of anyone working in the fire service. Having reflected on what the right hon. Member for Swansea, West (Mr. Williams) and the Minister had to say, I think that there is some force in the argument that if one lists certain defences in a Bill, the assumption will be made that the list is exhaustive. I have also reflected further during this short but very constructive debate on the fact that the Bill contains the phrase ““without reasonable excuse””. A good lawyer could bring most of the concerns that I have identified within the scope of those three words, and on that basis I beg to ask leave to withdraw the motion. Motion and clause, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c672-3
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Crimes of violence Health professions Emergency services Protection Staff Sentencing
- Legislation
- Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:57:01 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323938
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323938
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_323938