Proceeding contribution from David Heath (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 16 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill
The right hon. and learned Gentleman is absolutely right. Such statutory constraints on the exercise of a Select Committee’s discretion are unique, but it is clear that, as the hon. Member for Birmingham, Selly Oak (Lynne Jones) said earlier, most, if not all, of the good reasons for assessing that an order was inappropriate for the accelerated procedure would be declared ultra vires. We would have the absurd prospect that a Select Committee decision was justiciable—reviewable—on the basis that it had not followed criteria set down in statute in reaching its decision. When has a Select Committee ever been bound by statute, and justiciable in the courts, in the exercise of its discretion? The suggestion is preposterous.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c906
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Administration Business Bureaucracy Delegated legislation Legislative process EU law Legislative competence Government departments Legislation Members Parliamentary procedure Parliamentary scrutiny Reform Statutory instruments Legislative reform orders Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:39:25 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324121
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324121
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324121