Proceeding contribution from Baroness Barker (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Health Bill
In the unlikely event of the amendment being accepted, the noble Earl might have a case. There is a risk of incentivising failure, but I think that it is probably outweighed by the fact that a great deal of the funding that trusts receive—and, indeed, some of their eligibility to particular types of funding—depends on their overall rating by the Healthcare Commission. Given that the commission will monitor practice, I cannot see that there would be much of a case for trusts to try to gain extra resources through this area of their operation. Most trusts would stand to lose far more in other ways if they adopted that approach, but I take the noble Earl’s point.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c87-8GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Contracts Codes of practice Accountability Cooperation Hospitals Fees and charges Drugs Hygiene Infectious diseases Hospices NHS Pharmacy Ophthalmic services Prices Palliative care Technology
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:55:10 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324778
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324778
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324778