Proceeding contribution from Baroness Murphy (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Health Bill
I thank the Minister for his full exposition of the thinking behind these clauses. I welcome in particular his commitment to an extensive consultation with the various interested parties and the subsequent regulations. It is unlikely that I shall return to the matter on Report. The Minister’s commitment to producing detailed regulations—in particular, regulations to cover how to intervene to ensure supervision—is very helpful. I should add that the problem of the blue and white pills would have been solved if the GP’s electronic prescription had arrived the day before. The pharmacist could then have checked it on the spot and the error would have been prevented, rather than someone having to read a paper prescription. With that, I thank the Minister for his response and I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 75 not moved.] Clause 25 agreed to. Clauses 26 to 28 agreed to. Clause 29 [The responsible pharmacist]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c106GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Contracts Codes of practice Accountability Cooperation Hospitals Fees and charges Drugs Hygiene Infectious diseases Hospices NHS Pharmacy Ophthalmic services Prices Palliative care Technology
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:23:54 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324802
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324802
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_324802