Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Animal Welfare Bill.
Animal Welfare Bill
I am grateful to the noble Baroness for her response to my amendment. I am not trying to bowl a fast ball, but can I take it that it must be someone who is considered responsible—a vet or, in this case, a policeman—or can it be any person who comes across an animal and realises that that animal is in great distress and that its life cannot be saved? Are they included or excluded? I am happy for the Minister to come back to me later.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c157GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Animal welfare Abuse Circuses Dogs Domestic animals Game Protection Poisons Wildlife Electronic training aids
- Legislation
- Animal Welfare Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-11-22 22:55:36 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325323
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325323
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325323