Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Animal Welfare Bill.


Animal Welfare Bill

That was a useful debate. I am relieved that the noble Lord, Lord Soulsby, has pulled a rabbit out of the hat—or perhaps in this case ““pulled a dog out of the hat”” would be a better expression—and told us about the research the Companion Animal Welfare Council will undertake. I welcome that. I thought the debate also showed us how wonderfully we have evolved, because we no longer as often hear, ““A woman, a dog and a walnut tree””. I think the second line is, ““the more you beat them the better they be””. Fortunately, we have moved to a position where we think the first is unacceptable. I still have concerns, which I am sure the research will address. For example, security firms might take up the suggestion of the noble Lord, Lord Pearson, that it is much easier and quicker to train a dog using a shock collar. That might be done for reasons of cheapness if they needed to train a number of dogs. Whether, in welfare terms, it would be in the interests of the dog is still questionable. [The Sitting was suspended for a Division in the House from 6.45 until 6.55 pm.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c190GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Animal welfare Abuse Circuses Dogs Domestic animals Game Protection Poisons Wildlife Electronic training aids
Legislation
Animal Welfare Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk