Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 23 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Lottery Bill.


National Lottery Bill

My Lords, I was absent from Report by virtue of being in Killarney, so was not in a position to hear the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, move the relevant amendment, to which the Minister has in effect responded in speaking to Amendment No. 4. I have no problem with the amendment that the noble Lord moved on Report, nor do I have any problem with this one, but he said then that the clause was designed in essence to ensure that the National Lottery distributors took a greater part in publicising aspects of the National Lottery. Personally, I would have wanted Clause 11 to place stronger obligations on the distributors, because the current wording, which is permissive rather than statutory, does not seem to ensure that action is taken. But we live in an imperfect world, and the Bill will have to go on the statute book without that extra degree of compulsion.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c704 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Distribution Grants National Lottery Distribution Fund Lotteries National Lottery
Legislation
National Lottery Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk