Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Rob Wilson (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 24 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education and Inspections Bill.


Education and Inspections Bill

My hon. Friend makes a very good point, and I am sure that the Minister will respond later. Secondly, banding ultimately takes children away from their local school. They are bussed to schools in an extensive area for the sake of social engineering that diminishes parental choice. I do not understand how that fits with the LEA’s responsibility under the Bill to champion parental choice. I am sure that parents will not support the measure, so perhaps the Minister can explain why he thinks they will do so. I have serious concerns about whether banding will work effectively. The new clause, the Bill, and the code of admissions do not give the number of bands for good or best practice. Will there be a 10, five or three-band system? Will all those systems be used, and will the number of bands differ from school to school? Who decides the banding category? Is it the governors, the LEA or another authority? The proposal has not been properly thought through. I instinctively oppose anything that smacks of social engineering: clause 48 is an unnecessary interference in local administration of schools, so it should be removed. I hope that the Conservative spokesmen will press the matter to a vote.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
446 c1554 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Access Children Codes of practice Children in care Admissions Applications Ballots Administration Closures Cooperation Education Governing bodies Grammar schools Foundation schools Interviews Parents Local education authorities Membership Pupils Travel Standards Schools Special educational needs Secondary education Trust schools
Legislation
Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk