Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from David Laws (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 25 May 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Pensions Reform.


Pensions Reform

I am grateful to you, Mr. Deputy Speaker. These are important issues, and we are entitled to ask the Secretary of State for answers. Why has the Secretary of State rejected Lord Turner’s proposal to have a permanent standing commission on pensions and to consider those issues on an ongoing basis? Why does he suggest instead that there should simply be periodic reviews? Can he also return to the issue of public sector pensions and tell us whether the Government will at some stage set up a similar Turner-type review to consider the reform of public sector pensions? As we consider proposals for legislation, we also want to find as much cross-party consensus as possible. We have accepted major parts of today’s White Paper and the direction of travel. We are of the view, however, that the Government are only delivering half solution today, because of the inadequate nature of the basic pension system on which it will be built. We therefore fear that it will not be the final settled pensions solution that all of us have sought.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
446 c1656-7 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Age Women Insolvency Financial assistance scheme Index linking Pension credit Workplace pensions Pensions State retirement pensions Reform Retirement Average earnings Pensions Commission
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk