Proceeding contribution from Justine Greening (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 25 May 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Pensions Reform.
Pensions Reform
Given that one of the main drivers for reform is the decline in the dependency ratio over forthcoming decades, why did the Government opt for the tax-funded proposal outlined today, rather than an investment-funded one? Was such a proposal considered, and, if so, why was it thought less preferable than the one outlined today?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c1663
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Age Women Insolvency Financial assistance scheme Index linking Pension credit Workplace pensions Pensions State retirement pensions Reform Retirement Average earnings Pensions Commission
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:42:04 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327167
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327167
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327167