Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 7 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Electoral Administration Bill.
Electoral Administration Bill
My Lords, I think the House is entitled to conclude that if the noble Baroness cannot give your Lordships a reason for the distinction, then the distinction is a mindless distinction. In those circumstances, I find that the Minister’s response adds fuel to my determination to seek the opinion of your Lordships’ House. I beg to move. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 27) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 115; Not-Contents, 126. [Amendment No. 28 not moved.]
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c1308
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Accountability Armed forces Candidates Absent voting Campaigns Fraud Finance Elections Electorate Liability Donors Electoral register Pilot schemes Political parties Loans Proof of identity Negligence Registration
- Legislation
- Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:00:19 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327850
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327850
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_327850