Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Animal Welfare Bill.
Animal Welfare Bill
I understand entirely what the Minister has said about the drafting in Amendment No. 72 and I am sure we will come back to this. It the Minister does not approve of the idea of the super-affirmative procedure as a way of providing a real bite, what about restricting the clause by saying that regulations must be made in response to a real need based on clear evidence, and must be proportionate? Would that sort of restriction be appealing to the Minister?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 683 c10GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Animal housing Animal welfare Codes of practice Abuse Licensing Inspections Dogs Farms Domestic animals Local government Powers of entry Prosecutions Livestock Registration
- Legislation
- Animal Welfare Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:35:53 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329347
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329347
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_329347