Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 14 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Animal Welfare Bill.


Animal Welfare Bill

moved Amendment No. 150:"After Clause 42, insert the following new clause—" ““ORDERS MADE ON CONVICTION FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES Where an order is made under section 32(4)(e), 35(1)(e), 36(3)(e), 37(3)(e) or 38(1), the expenses that are required by the order to be reimbursed shall not be regarded for the purposes of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (c. 43) as a sum adjudged to be paid by a summary conviction, but shall be recoverable summarily as a civil debt.”” On Question, amendment agreed to. Clauses 43 to 47 agreed to. Clause 48 [Inspectors]: [Amendments Nos. 151 to 157 not moved.] Clause 48 agreed to. [Amendment No. 158 not moved.] Clauses 49 and 50 agreed to. Schedule 2 [Powers of entry, inspection and search: supplementary]: [Amendment No. 159 not moved.] Schedule 2 agreed to. Clauses 51 to 54 agreed to. Clause 55 [Scientific research]: [Amendments Nos. 160 and 161 not moved.] Clause 55 agreed to. Clauses 56 and 57 agreed to. Clause 58 [Orders and regulations]: [Amendment No. 162 not moved.]


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c63-4GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Animal housing Animal welfare Codes of practice Abuse Licensing Inspections Dogs Farms Domestic animals Local government Powers of entry Prosecutions Livestock Registration
Legislation
Animal Welfare Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk