Proceeding contribution from Lord Russell-Johnston (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill.
Health Bill
My Lords, I assure the noble Lord that the intention is directed at restaurants and pubs. Neither I nor my noble friend Lord Steel would necessarily claim legal drafting expertise, but I am sure that it would be possible to narrow the amendment. Of course, I certainly was not thinking of dividing school canteens into two, although that possibility may exist under certain wording. However, I would think that school canteens come under local authorities. Therefore, this would not apply. Finally, sometimes individuals choose to do things that perhaps they should not. But we should have the right to choose. This is about freedom and the right to choose one’s own lifestyle. I therefore wish to test the opinion of the House. On Question, Whether the said amendment (No. 1) shall be agreed to? Their Lordships divided: Contents, 70; Not-Contents, 221.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 683 c539-40
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Clubs Buildings Health hazards Exemptions Licensed premises Public places Passive smoking Ventilation Working conditions Restaurants Smoking
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-24 10:16:57 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_330429
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_330429
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_330429