Proceeding contribution from Lord Warner (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill.
Health Bill
My Lords, I do not believe that I have to give that evidence, when the point we are making is that a workplace is a workplace. A vehicle that is driven by more than one person—whether those people are employees, partners or whomever—is being occupied as a mobile workplace which is covered by this legislation. We believe that they are then exposed to a dangerous substance, whether they wish to be or not. We are saying that there is consistency between the mobile and the non-mobile workplace. I have already given the evidence on human carcinogens in second-hand smoke, and the fact that it lingers. We cannot be sure of it being cleared in a reasonable period so that people are not exposed to those human carcinogens. That is the substance of the arguments that I set out in Grand Committee, which I repeat today. Those arguments will not change in the Government’s view, which is why we believe that the legislation should stand as drafted.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 683 c612-3
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Age Business Health hazards Motor vehicles Public places Passive smoking Working conditions Sales Young people Warnings Smoking
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:42:44 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_330541
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_330541
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_330541