Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Warner (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 19 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill.


Health Bill

My Lords, I do not believe that I have to give that evidence, when the point we are making is that a workplace is a workplace. A vehicle that is driven by more than one person—whether those people are employees, partners or whomever—is being occupied as a mobile workplace which is covered by this legislation. We believe that they are then exposed to a dangerous substance, whether they wish to be or not. We are saying that there is consistency between the mobile and the non-mobile workplace. I have already given the evidence on human carcinogens in second-hand smoke, and the fact that it lingers. We cannot be sure of it being cleared in a reasonable period so that people are not exposed to those human carcinogens. That is the substance of the arguments that I set out in Grand Committee, which I repeat today. Those arguments will not change in the Government’s view, which is why we believe that the legislation should stand as drafted.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c612-3 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Age Business Health hazards Motor vehicles Public places Passive smoking Working conditions Sales Young people Warnings Smoking
Legislation
Health Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk