Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 June 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
The noble Baroness has anticipated wonderfully what I was going to say. I can be brief. She says the amendment seeks to give effect to one of the DPRRC’s recommendations. We are quite happy to accept that recommendation as we usually do. However, we think the wording of Amendment No. 47 is inconsistent with that used elsewhere in the Police Act 1996. There is an error there. I seek this from the noble Baroness: if she would agree simply to withdraw the amendment, the Government will table, as one would expect, an amendment that is appropriately worded and ensure that it is there in time for Report, accurately reflecting what the DPRRC seeks and what the noble Baroness now seeks too.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 683 c706-7
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Accountability Crimes against the person Costs Association of Chief Police Officers Equality Finance Homosexuality Police Powers Public appointments Racially aggravated offences Mergers Police authorities Standards Violence National Policing Improvement Agency Association of Police Authorities Police Standards Unit Hate crime
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:24:23 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331230
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331230
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_331230