Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 20 June 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.


Police and Justice Bill

The noble Baroness has anticipated wonderfully what I was going to say. I can be brief. She says the amendment seeks to give effect to one of the DPRRC’s recommendations. We are quite happy to accept that recommendation as we usually do. However, we think the wording of Amendment No. 47 is inconsistent with that used elsewhere in the Police Act 1996. There is an error there. I seek this from the noble Baroness: if she would agree simply to withdraw the amendment, the Government will table, as one would expect, an amendment that is appropriately worded and ensure that it is there in time for Report, accurately reflecting what the DPRRC seeks and what the noble Baroness now seeks too.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
683 c706-7 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Accountability Crimes against the person Costs Association of Chief Police Officers Equality Finance Homosexuality Police Powers Public appointments Racially aggravated offences Mergers Police authorities Standards Violence National Policing Improvement Agency Association of Police Authorities Police Standards Unit Hate crime
Legislation
Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk