Proceeding contribution from Andrew Love (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Electoral Administration Bill.
Electoral Administration Bill
That is a big topic, and you would call me to order, Madam Deputy Speaker, if I went off at a tangent to discuss that interesting and critical subject. I will resist the temptation to do so, although I acknowledge the importance of my hon. Friend’s contribution. Every time we debate this issue, the subject of electoral registration in Northern Ireland comes up. The figures show that there was a significant drop in registration following the introduction of additional identifiers in Northern Ireland, but it was partially reversed when a comprehensive canvass of electors was carried out. That suggests that the identifiers had a negative impact on registration in Northern Ireland, which, I emphasise, has a settled community. In a community with significant churn—for example, London—those difficulties are intensified. We can therefore say with some confidence that additional identifiers will dramatically reduce the number of people on the electoral register in cities such as London, as well as all major urban areas throughout the country.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 448 c305
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Administration Fraud Elections Electoral register Personation Proof of identity Registration
- Legislation
- Electoral Administration Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:52:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333536
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333536
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_333536