Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Lotteries Bill.


National Lotteries Bill

On health expenditure, to which the Minister referred, if—perhaps for financial reasons—the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence decides not to fund a particular treatment, will that not be a green light for the lottery to fund such expenditure in that very way? Our concern about additionality, particularly in relation to health, is that precisely such abuse of the lottery, which occurred in the past through the New Opportunities Fund, will occur in future through the Big Lottery Fund. Our worry is that at some future point, the Big Lottery Fund will look to adapt funding for health, education, the environment and perhaps other areas: that it will be taken out of general Government expenditure, and that, in effect, it will be at the mercy of the lottery. Does the Minister not understand that that is precisely our concern, and that the grey area of complementary or other funding cannot begin to deal with it? Will he give us some—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
448 c315-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Charities Health Finance Education Distribution Grants National Lottery Distribution Fund Olympic Games Lotteries National Lottery Sports Big Lottery Fund Heritage Lottery Fund National Lottery Commission
Legislation
National Lottery Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk