Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Field (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 28 June 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Lotteries Bill.


National Lotteries Bill

Thank you, Mr. Deputy Speaker, for your comments. I understand what you are saying, but I simply wanted to say that there is a strange paradox. We have discussed the tick-box culture and the hypothecation of the national lottery, so it is important that the Government accept the Lords amendments and the independence of the operation of the Big Lottery Fund. Distributors should be free from political interference; otherwise I fear that many initiatives would be open to hypothecation. As the Minister is aware, the bidding process for the third franchise, which now involves a 10-year term rather than a seven-year term, is already under way. The decision will have been made by this time next year, with the new lottery term beginning in February 2009. I hope that in the next six months we can debate in Government time the broader national lottery issues that I have tried to touch on in this brief contribution. As I have said, the Opposition have no objections to this group of amendments. I suspect that the hon. Member for Bath (Mr. Foster) has a few more words to say, although I do not want to steal his thunder.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
448 c331-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Charities Health Finance Education Distribution Grants National Lottery Distribution Fund Olympic Games Lotteries National Lottery Sports Big Lottery Fund Heritage Lottery Fund National Lottery Commission
Legislation
National Lottery Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk