Proceeding contribution from Earl of Onslow (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 July 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill
The answer is surely that the amendment is unnecessary because what it proposes is already included in, "““an administrative inconvenience … or … an obstacle to efficiency, productivity or profitability””." That is all that the Minister needed to say in reply to the amendment. We could have got on much quicker if he had simply produced the right answer, with which I happen to agree, rather than go waffling on about an awful lot else. I am simply being of assistance to Her Majesty’s present advisers in how to proceed with vigour and intellect.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 684 c50
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Crime Business Delegated legislation Legislation Ministerial powers Scotland Regulation Wales Taxation Legislative reform orders
- Legislation
- Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:35:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_334272
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_334272
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_334272