Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Goschen (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 3 July 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill.


Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill

I quite agree with my noble friend Lord Howard that to make the burden relate to ““an administrative inconvenience”” is the lowest possible hurdle that one can imagine, but then that fits in with the rest of subsection (3), which includes ““a financial cost””. To buy a cup of coffee in the Bishops’ Bar incurs a financial cost. Almost all legislation ever considered would impose a financial cost, and indeed would be an obstacle to efficiency, productivity or profitability. Therefore, I suggest that the whole subsection is otiose. There is no hurdle, and it must come down to the safeguards that we must impose later in the Bill.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c51 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Crime Business Delegated legislation Legislation Ministerial powers Scotland Regulation Wales Taxation Legislative reform orders
Legislation
Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk