Proceeding contribution from Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 5 July 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Private Security Industry Act 2001 (Amendments to Schedule 2) Order 2006.
Private Security Industry Act 2001 (Amendments to Schedule 2) Order 2006
My Lords, where we may be at cross purposes is that Section 40 does not refer to detainee custody officers but to ““an authorised person””. But that authorised person, who has the functions that I described, may be a civilian employed by a contractor.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 684 c318
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Debt collection Employment Immobilisation of vehicles Licensing Immigration Exemptions Industry Police Prisons Security Security guards
- Legislation
- Private Security Industry Act 2001 (Amendments to Schedule 2) Order 2006
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 23:23:55 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335360
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335360
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_335360