Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 11 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on National Lottery Bill.


National Lottery Bill

My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons amendment and reasons be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. [The page and line references are to HL Bill 67 as first printed for the Lords.]"1: Clause 7, page 5, line 13, leave out ““prescribed””""The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason—""1A: Because it would not be appropriate to remove the power of the Secretary of State to prescribe descriptions of expenditure""2: Page 5, line 19, leave out subsection (3)""The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason—""2A: Because it would not be appropriate to remove the power of the Secretary of State to prescribe descriptions of expenditure""7: Clause 14, page 9, line 13, leave out ““comply with”” and insert ““take account of””""The Commons disagree to this Amendment, but propose Amendment 7A in lieu—""7A: Page 9, line 17, leave out paragraphs (a) to (d) and insert ““, specify matters to be taken into account in determining the persons to whom, the purposes for which and the conditions subject to which the Fund distributes money.””"


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c591 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Accountability Expenditure Distribution Lotteries National Lottery Parliamentary scrutiny Big Lottery Fund
Legislation
National Lottery Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk