Proceeding contribution from Caroline Flint (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 18 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill.
Health Bill
Through amendment No. 3, we have left the door open on exempting rehearsals, as we are still yet to be persuaded. We must not forget that any exemption is for the performer, not the premises, and that the smoker will be facilitated only when it is integral to the plot or storyline. We must be clear that this exemption is not about allowing certain people to smoke freely. From a purely practical point of view, we must ask whether it would be sensible or practical to light up and stub out cigarettes each time the rehearsal of a performance stops and starts. We will seek to clarify that through the consultation. As I said, I have taken note of the experience not only of Ireland and Scotland but of New York and California, which have exemptions in these artistic areas.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 449 c179
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Codes of practice Age Fraud Hospitals Health hazards Drugs Infectious diseases NHS Motor vehicles Powers of entry Personal records Public places Passive smoking MRSA Performing arts Sales Young people Smoking
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 09:59:00 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338766
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338766
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338766