Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Steve Webb (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 18 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Health Bill.


Health Bill

No discussion on the Health Bill would be complete with the hon. Gentleman trying to bring cannabis into it. He seems to be fixated on it—I do not know whether there is anything that he would like to declare at this point. Amendment No. 3 would allow the regulations to include rehearsals. Perhaps the Minister will regard this as a formal response to her formal consultation on the regulations: please do not include rehearsals. Whereas performances are a limited number of occurrences, allowing smoking during a long run of rehearsals would be potentially much more detrimental to the people who support the rehearsal process. Amendment No. 12 deals with not raising beyond 18 the age of sale for cigarettes. We welcome that. Going beyond 18 would raise a much wider set of issues because there are many other things for which 18 is a trigger age, and it would not be satisfactory to try to change that by regulation. The House is, as you can see, Mr. Deputy Speaker, gripped by this set of amendments. It is tempting to test the view of the House on them, but I do not sense that we would get very far, so I probably will not pursue the matter. However, I would be interested to hear the Minister’s comment on enforcement. Amendment No. 2 refers to ““artistic integrity””. Who will judge that, and how will they be trained to do so?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
449 c184 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Codes of practice Age Fraud Hospitals Health hazards Drugs Infectious diseases NHS Motor vehicles Powers of entry Personal records Public places Passive smoking MRSA Performing arts Sales Young people Smoking
Legislation
Health Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk