Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Warnock (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Education and Inspections Bill.


Education and Inspections Bill

I hope it is in order for me to make an addendum to what the noble Lord, Lord Dearing, has just said. One of the justifications for introducing the system of statementing in the original 1978 report was precisely that the statement should follow the child. That was not included in the 1981 Act, for obvious reasons; no one was interested in the motivation of the statement, they were just interested in its introduction. This remained, at least in my mind, the most important element in the statement, and it has been gradually dropped to the extent that now, if a parent moves from one local authority to another, the statement is not automatically renewed or regarded, and the whole process of statementing, including a new tribunal, has to be started all over again. A child may miss months of education in that way. I support the amendment very strongly.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c1461-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Travel Access Disability Children Assessments Admissions Curriculum Appeals Bus services City technology colleges Governing bodies Faith schools Languages Health education Internet History Local education authorities Standards Regulation Transport Schools Special educational needs School choice Secondary education Vocational education Science GCSE Geography Academies
Legislation
Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk