Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sutherland of Houndwood (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Education and Inspections Bill.


Education and Inspections Bill

One cannot but be sympathetic to the amendment’s intention and the arguments that lie behind it. Every school one visits and every teacher one talks to points to the increasing burden. The difficulty is that it is increasing. That being the case, I hope that we can have some sort of response that indicates a seriousness of mind and intention to find practical ways of reducing this burden. However, I take note of and am encouraged by the way in which the previous Education Act reduced the burden of inspection. The consequences of the proposed legislation will be a reduction in the number of inspecting bodies visiting schools. None the less, for the individual teacher on the front line, this is a serious problem.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
684 c1479 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Travel Access Disability Children Assessments Admissions Curriculum Appeals Bus services City technology colleges Governing bodies Faith schools Languages Health education Internet History Local education authorities Standards Regulation Transport Schools Special educational needs School choice Secondary education Vocational education Science GCSE Geography Academies
Legislation
Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk