Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 20 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee of the Whole House (HL) on Education and Inspections Bill.
Education and Inspections Bill
Clearly I will have an opportunity to quiz the Minister in October about what was said to him in July about the IGCSE, but I know that the examining bodies are extremely unhappy about the methodology of the review because it does not look at outcomes or the quality of pupils and is being carried out by people who have no track record. They are also concerned about the speed of the review. They would rather have had a properly set up and properly contemplative review that would produce a reasonable and rational view of whether the IGCSE is up to scratch.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 684 c1515
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Travel Access Disability Children Assessments Admissions Curriculum Appeals Bus services City technology colleges Governing bodies Faith schools Languages Health education Internet History Local education authorities Standards Regulation Transport Schools Special educational needs School choice Secondary education Vocational education Science GCSE Geography Academies
- Legislation
- Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-02 20:04:04 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340102
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340102
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_340102