Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Jim Dowd (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 25 July 2006. It occurred during Tribute on Sir Roger Sands KCB.


Sir Roger Sands KCB

What, the House of Lords? I then went with a delegation, led by my right hon. Friend the Member for Knowsley, North and Sefton, East (Mr. Howarth), to press for an amendment on the abolition of the House of Lords to be included. We reasoned this with Roger and his colleagues, and they were very kind to us. Being enlightened and sensible, they agreed that they would recommend this course of action to Mr. Speaker. The power to decide whether such an amendment should be included does not lie with the Clerks; they simply recommend such proposals to the Speaker. We had obtained more than 100 signatures to that amendment. Technically, however, the only way of tabling it would have been to table it as an amendment to every one of the seven options that came out of the report. In a spirit of consensual reasonableness, I said to Roger, ““Of course, we would not expect it to be repeated on every amendment. We only need to take the top six of the subsequent amendments. After all, we would not want to block up the Order Paper.”” Roger then said, in his charmingly laconic, quizzical and amusing way, ““Ah, a gang of hardened revolutionaries not wanting to block up the Order Paper—whatever next?”” I thank Sir Roger for his advice, courtesy and service to the House over the past 40 years. I would also like to thank Lady Jennifer, who has been a valued and much appreciated volunteer at the Sydenham citizens advice bureau, where she has made a considerable contribution. Along with all other hon. Members, I wish them every happiness and good fortune in retirement.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
449 c763 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
House of Commons Staff Retirement Clerk of the House Sands, Roger
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk