Proceeding contribution from Speaker in the House of Commons on Friday, 20 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Government and Planning (Parkland and Windfall Development) Bill.
Local Government and Planning (Parkland and Windfall Development) Bill
I said to the hon. Member for Hendon (Mr. Dismore) that the quality of his original point of order was such that it did not strictly constitute a point of order. However, I have now allowed the hon. Member for Uxbridge (Mr. Randall) to make a counter point, from which I am sure the House will benefit. If he is correct, all our sympathies go to the hon. Member for Hendon because a little more attention to detail would have spared him an early morning alarm call.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c1164
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Related items
-
Local Government and Planning (Parkland and Windfall Development) Bill
Friday, 20 October 2006
Proceeding contributions
House of Commons
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:07:35 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353627
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353627
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_353627