Proceeding contribution from David Miliband (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 25 October 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Radioactive Waste Management Report.
Radioactive Waste Management Report
The hon. Gentleman has made an important point, and he is absolutely right. Anyone who reads the CoRWM report will see how much time and effort CoRWM devoted to engaging not just with scientific experts, but with members of the public with no expertise, and will recognise that time and money were well spent. The hon. Gentleman mentioned France and Finland in one breath. While I would like to learn from the experience of both countries, I would not wish to give the impression that they are the same. The Finns are adopting what might be described as a consensual or voluntarist approach, while the French have a Napoleonic tradition that is rather more dictatorial, or at least centralist.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 450 c1528
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Local government Radioactive waste Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Storage Waste management United Kingdom NIREX Waste disposal Committee on Radioactive Waste Management Geology
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:20:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_354881
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_354881
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_354881