Proceeding contribution from Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 October 2006. It occurred during Question for short debate on Museums and Galleries.
Museums and Galleries
The Minister need not have the fear that he has just expressed. I see no difference in principle between this and the procedures followed by the reviewing committee. In 1922, the Treasury committed itself in the future to providing funds at a reasonable valuation that was made at the time. It did not undertake to chase the art market forever upwards, but it did undertake to support the National Gallery to pay up to what was considered to be a fair valuation at that moment in the history of the art market. It worked; the National Gallery subsequently secured four out of the seven on the original list. I do not think there was any question of an infringement of property rights, as they were understood in those days or, indeed, as they are understood now.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 686 c55-6GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Cultural heritage Artworks Finance Licensing Exports National Lottery Museums and galleries National Heritage Memorial Fund Prices Objects in lieu of tax Sales Tax allowances Collections
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:06:11 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_355845
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_355845
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_355845