Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl of Onslow (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 30 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Education and Inspections Bill.


Education and Inspections Bill

My Lords, it is self-evident from what the noble Lord, Lord Alton, said that the Roman Catholic Church is acting in a selective and self-protecting way. It is perfectly understandable. My noble friend Lord Baker and others have created a real danger of Muslim schools undergoing the same ghettoisation—I am not sure whether that is the right word but I am afraid that it is what they want to do. It is not often realised, for instance, that in the Muslim world there is no conception like ours in the Christian world of: "““Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s””." Throughout Muslim history there has been tension with secular government, because in theory the prophet did not allow it. Everything had to be governed under Sharia or religious law. Christianity, luckily for itself, had the ability to separate the two. The Church of England has been fundamental to the development of the ethos of the United Kingdom. As I said to a bishop earlier, I am not even sure that the Church of England always believes in God. He quite charmingly proved my point by saying, ““I think we do””. The Church of England’s very broadminded and, if I may say so, very English approach to religion and society has made its schools particularly good. The other Churches felt left out and asked for help to preserve their separate identity. That is why Peel paid for Maynooth Roman Catholic seminary well before 1902 and Lloyd George. It was designed by Pugin and paid for by the English taxpayer. The very real danger that has been shown is that of exclusive schools, and we do not address it at our peril. I will vote for the amendment of my noble friend Lord Baker, even though I was deeply influenced by the stunning performance of the noble Lord, Lord Brennan, and quite understand why he is such a brilliantly paid barrister. I agree with him legislatively, but I feel so strongly about the danger of faith schools at the fringe, beyond the Roman Catholic, Church of England and, probably, Jewish schools, that I must vote for my noble friend Lord Baker. I do not think that we have yet addressed this serious problem as much as we should.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
686 c121-2 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Admissions Discipline Community development Community schools Catholicism Fees and charges Education Faith schools Discrimination Pupil exclusions Public places Music Offences against children Muslims Schools Teachers Training Religion
Legislation
Education and Inspections Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk