Proceeding contribution from Lord Herbert of South Downs (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 30 October 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Violent Crime Reduction Bill.
Violent Crime Reduction Bill
Our concern about alcohol disorder zones was that retailers would be penalised for disorder caused by nearby pubs and clubs and that a blanket measure could be unfair. In the main, those concerns have been allayed during the Bill’s passage through Parliament. The Government have reassured us that alcohol disorder zones will be a last resort and will not become a routine intervention and that they will review the operation of alcohol disorder orders two years after implementation. We have also been reassured by amendments Nos. 28 and 29, which make it clear that draft regulations must be laid before and duly approved by this House and the other place. The other Lords amendments in this group are largely consequential and technical, and we are happy to support them.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 451 c48
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Ammunition Crime Alcoholic drinks Crimes of violence Anti-social behaviour Airguns Firearms Imitation firearms Local government Powers of entry Police Museums and galleries Misuse Offensive weapons Schools Sexual offences Security Sportsgrounds Right of search Touting Tickets Drinking banning orders Alcohol disorder zones
- Legislation
- Violent Crime Reduction Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 20:37:31 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_356141
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_356141
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_356141