Proceeding contribution from Phil Woolas (Labour) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 1 November 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Population Growth (Local Government Finance).
Population Growth (Local Government Finance)
The hon. Gentleman said in his speech that his authority was not unique—that the problem applied also to Enfield and no doubt to other authorities. Perhaps I may respond to the hon. Gentleman by sending him more information on this important subject. Briefly, there are two points to consider. First, the revenue support grant is a cake that is distributed between all the authorities. Where there are winners, there are losers, and one has to be fair and consistent. Secondly, as I explained, in making the changes to the formula grant that I announced in the House last December, I took into account the need for future projections rather than relying wholly on historical trends. Perhaps I may write to the hon. Gentleman with more detail so that we can discuss the matter elsewhere.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 451 c140WH
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- Westminster Hall
- Subjects
- Grants Ethnic groups Local government finance Population Migration
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-05 23:18:00 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357035
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357035
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357035