Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons amendments and reasons be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. [The page and line references are to Bill 104 as first printed for the Lords.] 1: Before Clause 2, insert the following new Clause- ““Revised power to alter police areas by order In section 32(3) of the Police Act 1996 (c. 16) (power to alter police areas by order)- (a) leave out ““either””; (b) in paragraph (a) for ““or”” substitute ““and””.”” The Commons disagree to this amendment for the following reason- 1A: Because it would be inappropriate to change, in the way that the Lords Amendment would do, the provisions of the Police Act 1996 about making alterations in police areas by order
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 686 c251
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Extradition Inspections Fixed penalties Functions HM Inspectorate of Constabulary International law HM Inspectorate of Prisons Offenders Police Powers Prosecutions Mergers Police authorities Police cautions Standards Treaties HM Inspectorate of Probation Victims USA HM Inspectorate of Court Administration HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 12:26:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357410
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357410
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357410