Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.


Police and Justice Bill

My Lords, I shall be brief. Listening to the debate, I have sometimes been uncertain whether we were being asked to amend the treaty signed in 2003 or the extradition designation order of that year. If there is an imbalance, that imbalance is in the treaty so recently agreed. It might be as well to have the wording in mind. Article 8.3, to which the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, has referred, states that, "““for requests to the United States, such information as would provide a reasonable basis to believe that the person sought committed the offence for which extradition is requested””—" but not the other way around. That is the treaty obligation into which we entered and which the United States, as I understand it, has now ratified. As I understand it, ratification brings that treaty into force. If it does not—


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
686 c297 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Extradition Inspections Fixed penalties Functions HM Inspectorate of Constabulary International law HM Inspectorate of Prisons Offenders Police Powers Prosecutions Mergers Police authorities Police cautions Standards Treaties HM Inspectorate of Probation Victims USA HM Inspectorate of Court Administration HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate
Legislation
Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk