Proceeding contribution from Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 1 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.
Police and Justice Bill
My Lords, I shall be brief. Listening to the debate, I have sometimes been uncertain whether we were being asked to amend the treaty signed in 2003 or the extradition designation order of that year. If there is an imbalance, that imbalance is in the treaty so recently agreed. It might be as well to have the wording in mind. Article 8.3, to which the noble Lord, Lord Goodhart, has referred, states that, "““for requests to the United States, such information as would provide a reasonable basis to believe that the person sought committed the offence for which extradition is requested””—" but not the other way around. That is the treaty obligation into which we entered and which the United States, as I understand it, has now ratified. As I understand it, ratification brings that treaty into force. If it does not—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 686 c297
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Extradition Inspections Fixed penalties Functions HM Inspectorate of Constabulary International law HM Inspectorate of Prisons Offenders Police Powers Prosecutions Mergers Police authorities Police cautions Standards Treaties HM Inspectorate of Probation Victims USA HM Inspectorate of Court Administration HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate
- Legislation
- Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-05-13 12:26:13 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357447
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357447
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_357447