Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Companies Bill [HL].


Companies Bill [HL]

had given notice of his intention to move, as an amendment to Amendment No. 17, Amendment No. 17A: 17A Clause 22, Line 4, leave out ““all”” and insert ““90% of”” The noble Lord said: My Lords, my amendment concerns the reduction from unanimity to 90 per cent for the introduction of an entrenched article. Having heard what the Minister has had to say and taken further advice externally, I do not intend to move my amendment, although I realise that I run the risk of rousing the ire of the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, in so doing. [Amendment No. 17A, as an amendment to Amendment No. 17, not moved.] On Question, Motion agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
686 c438 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Accountability Charities Audit Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Business Conduct Annual reports Certification Freedom of information Inspections Eligibility Liability Donors EU law Investment Ethics Powers Membership Public interest Political parties Public companies Loans Private companies Small businesses Shares Trade unions Voting rights Shareholders
Legislation
Companies Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk