Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 2 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Companies Bill [HL].


Companies Bill [HL]

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 994. It removes subsection (3) of Clause 923. Subsection (3) was inserted in this House to declare that nothing in the Bill would involve a charge on public funds to avoid infringing the privilege of the other place to control charges on public funds. The insertion of this wording is termed the ““privilege amendment””. The other place have now approved the charges on the public fund in the Bill and removed subsection (3) by Amendment No. 994. In moving the amendment I claim three records—for the longest Bill to come before Parliament, the largest list of amendments from the Commons, and, finally, for the longest list of amendments moved en bloc. Moved, That the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 994.—(Lord Sainsbury of Turville.) On Question, Motion agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
686 c509-10 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Accountability Charities Audit Company law Company accounts Companies Directors Business Conduct Annual reports Certification Freedom of information Inspections Eligibility Liability Donors EU law Investment Ethics Powers Membership Public interest Political parties Public companies Loans Private companies Small businesses Shares Trade unions Voting rights Shareholders
Legislation
Companies Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk