Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 7 November 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Charities Bill [HL].


Charities Bill [HL]

My Lords, I entirely agree with the noble Lord, Lord Shutt, on that point. It is important that we have flexibility, and if we had not put these amendments in place I feel we would have lost that, which would have been unfortunate. The review of the operation of the Act, which can be instituted under Clause 72, kicks in after five years. The provision to which this amendment relates, if uncorrected, would have got in the way of the commitment that has been made to carry out within one year of Royal Assent a review of all the financial thresholds in the Charities Act 1993 and in the Bill. This amendment will remove the anomaly, and will allow the general registration threshold to be varied should the review of financial thresholds point that way, allowing the Government to be in a position to implement any recommendations from the review. After this amendment, all thresholds except the one relating to excepted charities can be altered at any time. As I said, the Government will initiate a review a year after Royal Assent. On Question, Motion agreed to. 7: Page 12, line 22, leave out ““by the Commission”” 8: Page 12, line 31, leave out ““by the Secretary of State””


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
686 c699 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Charities Armed forces Audit Accountancy Companies Charity Commission Charitable donations Departmental responsibilities Health Government departments Emergency services Fundraising Facilities Northern Ireland Police Regulation Tax allowances Roads Taxation Sports
Legislation
Charities Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk