Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Anne Snelgrove (Labour) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 7 November 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Farepak.


Farepak

Absolutely—my hon. Friend is quite right. There is also the issue of the bond. A lot of people wrote to me to say that the company had a bond, but it was laughable. It made customers feel protected, but it was for £100,000, which is peanuts as compared with £45 million. The Hamper Industry Trade Association Ltd called the bond"““a commitment of good intent””." I hope that the Minister will say that, if a company advertises a bond, it should be sufficient to cover that company’s liabilities. We are told that the Hamper Industry Trade Association Ltd urged Farepak in August to safeguard its savers’ money, but the firm said that protecting clients was not a legal requirement. I think that it should be and I hope that hon. Members in all parts of the Chamber think so, too.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
451 c190WH 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
Westminster Hall
Subjects
Companies Closures Personal savings Farepak HBOS
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk