Proceeding contribution from Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 4 December 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Nuclear Deterrent.
Nuclear Deterrent
My Lords, I welcome the Statement and the bipartisan approach that it has received in this House and the other place. Sitting on the fence makes no sense at all. The life of the submarines has been extended to meet the current decision’s timescale, with the order for a new submarine next year. Bearing in mind that we had problems with Polaris in the latter period of its life, it would be foolish to try to extend the existing Vanguard submarines even further. Can the Minister clarify the funding of these submarines? In the Statement, it appeared that there would be additional funding, but in response to an earlier question, the Minister seemed to suggest that the money would come out of the ordinary defence budget. Perhaps she could explain whether it will come from the ordinary defence budget or whether there will be additional funds for this very important replacement for the Trident system.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 687 c987
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Nuclear weapons Procurement USA Nuclear submarines Trident
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:23:25 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_362648
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_362648
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_362648