Proceeding contribution from Michael Meacher (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 December 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Trident.
Trident
Given a cost of up to £75 billion—including the cost of maintenance over a lifespan of 30 years—how can this proposal be justified in an utterly different, post-cold-war environment, when it will severely restrict much more needed conventional defence expenditure? It will clearly undermine the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, especially for Iran, and it will drain off colossal sums of money from where they are most needed to deal with the real threats that confront us—terrorism, climate change and long-term energy insecurity.025
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 454 c29
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Nuclear weapons Procurement USA Nuclear submarines Trident
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:23:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_362738
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_362738
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_362738