Proceeding contribution from Peter Kilfoyle (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 4 December 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Trident.
Trident
The Prime Minister is right to remind the House that we are not experts on this subject, but Theodore Postol is. Let me explain for the House’s benefit that Theodore Postol is a professor of physics at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is also the former United States official responsible for the development and implementation of the Trident II system. He told me at the weekend that the American equivalent of the Vanguard class of submarine, the Ohio class, lasted 45 years despite having twice as much sea time as our boats, and that the Americans are currently converting some of their Trident-carrying boats into cruise-carrying submarines. Does the Prime Minister agree with Ted Postol? Could we not convert some of our boats, and avoid disproportionate expenditure?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 454 c30
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Nuclear weapons Procurement USA Nuclear submarines Trident
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 11:23:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_362742
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_362742
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_362742