Proceeding contribution from Nick Hurd (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 12 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Greater London Authority Bill.
Greater London Authority Bill
Does the Minister agree that such an emotive change to planning powers should be evidence-based? If so, where is the hard evidence that important strategic developments for London are being refused and frustrated by inappropriate refusals at the borough level?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 454 c758
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Staff Devolved matters Accountability Housing Environment Greater London Greater London Authority Functions Local government Planning permission Pay Powers Pensions Planning Members Mayor of London Local government executive Waste disposal Reform London Assembly Lead Development Association Transport Museum of London Statutory instruments Public health
- Legislation
- Greater London Authority Bill 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-30 18:37:21 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364867
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364867
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_364867